• There are no items in your cart
We noticed you’re not on the correct regional site. Switch to our AMERICAS site for the best experience.
Dismiss alert

AEP-41 VOL 1 : 2004

Superseded
Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by
superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

UNIFIED ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS (UE[3]) PROTECTION, PHILOSOPHY AND METHODOLOGY
Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF

Superseded date

13-03-2023

Language(s)

English

Published date

01-02-2004

Publisher

NATO

1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 AEP 41, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO AEP 41
    2.1.1 Balanced E[3] Protection
    2.1.2 E[3] Protection Needs
    2.1.3 Methodology
2.2 SCOPE FOR AEP 41
    2.2.1 Volume I
    2.2.2 Volume II
    2.2.3 Volume III
    2.2.4 Volume IV
    2.2.5 Volume V
    2.2.6 Volume VI
    2.2.7 Volume VII
2.3 REQUIREMENTS
3.0 AEP 41, VOLUME I, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
    3.1.1 Philosophy
    3.1.2 Methodology
3.2 SCOPE FOR AEP 41, VOLUME I
    3.2.1 Philosophy and Methodology
    3.2.2 Risks
4.0 UNIFIED ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS PROTECTION
4.1 OVERVIEW
    4.1.1 General
    4.1.2 Electromagnetic Environments (EMEs)
    4.1.3 Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E[3])
          Survivability
          4.1.3.1 UE[3] Protection
          4.1.3.2 Alternate and Special Protection Methods
                  4.1.3.2.1 Alternate Methods
                  4.1.3.2.2 Special Protection Methods
    4.1.4 Evolution of Electronics and Increased COTS/NDI Usage
    4.1.5 Unified E[3] Protection Approach Overview
          4.1.5.1 General
          4.1.5.2 Route to Adequate Protection
                  4.1.5.2.1 Development of E[3] Protection
                  4.1.5.2.2 Hardening Requirement
                  4.1.5.2.3 Testing and Validation of UE[3]
                            Protection
                  4.1.5.2.4 Stress Transfer Function
4.2 LIFE-CYCLE APPLICATION OF THE UE[3] PROTECTION PHILOSOPHY
    AND METHODOLOGY
    4.2.1 General
    4.2.2 Phase 1: Concept Definition
          4.2.2.1 General
          4.2.2.2 Requirements
          4.2.2.3 Unified E[3] Protection Concept
                  4.2.2.3.1 General
                  4.2.2.3.2 EM Barrier Protection Concept
          4.2.2.4 Life-Cycle Program
    4.2.3 Phase 2: Engineering Development
          4.2.3.1 General
          4.2.3.2 E[3] Allocation Process Overview
          4.2.3.3 Unified E[3] Protection Allocation
                  4.2.3.3.1 Performance Requirements
                  4.2.3.3.2 Allocation Process
                            a. MSCEs Immunity
                            b. Margin
                            c. Internal Residuals
                            d. External EME Stress
                            e. Barrier Performance
                               Requirements
          4.2.3.4 Design for a Linear Application
                  4.2.3.4.1 Unified Barrier Performance
                            Requirements (Single EME &
                            Immunity)
                            a. General Approach
                               1) EME/Immunity
                               2) Margin
                               3) Residual and Performance
                                  Requirements
                            b. Enclosure Port Performance
                               Requirements
                            c. Penetration Port Performance
                               Requirements
                               1) Penetration Port
                               2) Immunity Equivalent Source
                               3) Penetration Equivalent Source
                               4) Performance Requirements
                  4.2.3.4.2 Unified Barrier Performance
                            Requirements (Single EME and
                            Multiple Immunities)
                            a. Specific Performance
                               Requirements (One MSCE)
                            b. Specific Performance
                               Requirements (Multiple MSCEs)
                  4.2.3.4.3 Unified Barrier Performance
                            Requirements (Multiple EMEs and
                            Immunities)
                            a. General
                            b. Unified Performance Requirements
                               for Ports
                            c. Unified Performance Requirements
                               for EMEs
                  4.2.3.4.4 Allocations for Internally Generated
                            EMEs
                  4.2.3.4.5 Design for Non-Linear Application
          4.2.3.5 Testing
                  4.2.3.5.1 Tests
                  4.2.3.5.2 Unification of Tests
          4.2.3.6 Life-Cycle Database
    4.2.4 Phase 3: Production
          4.2.4.1 General
          4.2.4.2 Quality Assurance and Control
          4.2.4.3 Testing
          4.2.4.4 Life-Cycle Database
    4.2.5 Phase 4: Deployment
          4.2.5.1 General
          4.2.5.2 Traditional Factors
          4.2.5.3 Modern Factors
                  4.2.5.3.1 General
                  4.2.5.3.2 Operational Status
                            a. DMSMS
                            b. Improved Capabilities
                            c. COTS/NDIs
                            d. Modernization Through Spares
                  4.2.5.3.3 Technology
          4.2.5.4 Life-Cycle Database
    4.2.6 Surveillance Test (ST)
          4.2.6.1 Hardness Assurance
          4.2.6.2 Sustainment Assurance
          4.2.6.3 Life-cycle Database
5.0 SUMMARY
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
7.0 APPENDIX
7.1 REFERENCES
7.2 ACRONYMS
7.3 DEFINITION

Describes an approach for achieving adequate, affordable and balanced UE[3] protection and survivability in the battlespace for all classes of NATO military platforms, systems, and equipments (all three defined as hardware) of the six operational categories.

DocumentType
Standard
Pages
74
PublisherName
NATO
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy

STANREC 4567 : 2014 NATO IMPLEMENTATION OF UNIFIED PROTECTION AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS (UE3)
DEFSTAN 59-188(PT2)/2(2017) : 2017 HIGH ALTITUDE ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (HEMP) PROTECTION FOR GROUND BASED COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PERFORMING CRITICAL, TIME-URGENT MISSIONS - PART 2: TRANSPORTABLE AND MOBILE SYSTEMS
DEFSTAN 59-188(PT1)/2(2014) : 2014 HIGH ALTITUDE ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (HEMP) PROTECTION FOR GROUND BASED COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PERFORMING CRITICAL, TIME-URGENT MISSIONS - PART 1: FIXED FACILITIES

STANAG 3659 : 2002 ELECTRICAL BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR METALLIC AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
STANAG 3614 : 2002 ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS (E[3]) - REQUIREMENTS FOR AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
MIL-STD-469 Revision B:1996 INTERFACE STANDARD FOR RADAR ENGINEERING INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS, ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
MIL-STD-464 Revision C:2010 ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS REQUIREMENTS FOR SYSTEMS
IEEE/ANSI C63.14-2014 REDLINE American National Standard Dictionary of Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) including Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3)
MIL-STD-461 Revision G:2015 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
STANAG 4435 : 0 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY TESTING PROCEDURE AND REQUIREMENTS FOR NAVAL ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT (SURFACE SHIP, METALLIC HULL)
STANAG 3516 : 2010 ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE, TEST METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
SAE ARP 5412 : 2013 AIRCRAFT LIGHTNING ENVIRONMENT AND RELATED TEST WAVEFORMS
STANAG 3856 : 0 PROTECTION OF AIRCRAFT, CREW AND SUB-SYSTEMS IN FLIGHT AGAINST ELECTROSTATIC CHARGES - AEP-29

View more information
Free

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.