ASTM D 6931 : 2012
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
Hardcopy , PDF
11-11-2014
English
02-01-2012
1.1 This test method covers procedures for preparing and testing laboratory-fabricated or field-recovered cores of bituminous mixtures to determine the Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength.
1.2 The within-laboratory repeatability standard deviation, for the recommended rate of loading (50 mm/min) and test temperature (25ºC), has been determined to be 80 kPa for 101.6 mm diameter specimens, based on 28 labs using either 2 or 4 test replicates with 11 different mix samples. Additional data is provided in Table 1 for the user’s information. The between-laboratory reproducibility of this test method is being determined and will be available on or before August 2012. Therefore, this test method should not be used for acceptance or rejection of materials for purchasing purposes.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
| Source of Data | Number of Replicates | Specimen Diameter (mm) | Loading Rate (mm/min) | Test Temperature (°C) | Average Strength (kPa) | Standard Deviation Strength (kPa) | d2s (2.83×SE) (kPa) | Standard Deviation Strength (% mean) | d2s (2.83×SE) (% mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson and McGennisA | 3 | 150 | 12.5 | -10 | 2870 | 200 | 566 | 7.0 | 19.8 |
| N CHRP Report 530B | 3 | 150 | 12.5 | -10 | - | - | - | 9 | 22–32 |
| (4 aggregate types; 4 binders) | 2 | 150 | 12.5 | -10 | - | - | - | 11 | |
| (nom max size: 9.5 mm to 25 mm) | |||||||||
| Solaimanian and KennedyC | 4 | 100 | 50 | 25 | - | 103 | 292 | – | – |
| moisture-conditioned | 50 | 25 | - | 83 | 234 | – | – | ||
| (9 labs; 3 aggregate types; 2 binders) | |||||||||
| Test Method D4867/D4867M (dry or conditioned) | 2 | 100 | 50 | 25 | - | 55 | 159 | – | – |
| (19 labs; 5 mixtures) | |||||||||
| Suggested Single Lab Precision | 50 | 25 | 80 |
A R. M. Anderson and R. B. McGennis, “Ruggedness Evaluation of AASHTO TP7 and TP9,” Phase I, FHWA HIPT (Task J), Federal Highway Administration, November 1998.
B W. Christensen and R. F. Bonaquist, “Evaluation of Indirect Tensile Test (IDT) Procedures for Low-Temperature Performance of Hot Mix Asphalt,” NCHRP Report 530.
C Solaimanian and T. W. Kennedy, “Precision of the Moisture Susceptibility Test Method TEX-531-C,” Project Summary Report 4909-S, November 2000.
Important note : All end users must be registered with an Account prior to user licenses being assigned.Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.