• There are no items in your cart

ASTM F 2978 : 2013

Superseded
Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by
superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

Guide to Optimize Scan Sequences for Clinical Diagnostic Evaluation of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Devices using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF

Superseded date

10-22-2020

Language(s)

English

Published date

12-01-2013

This guide describes the recommended protocol for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of patients implanted with metal-on-metal (MOM) devices to determine if the periprosthetic tissues are likely to be associated with an adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR).

1.1This guide describes the recommended protocol for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of patients implanted with metal-on-metal (MOM) devices to determine if the periprosthetic tissues are likely to be associated with an adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR). Before scanning a patient with a specific implant, the MR practitioner shall confirm that the device is MR Conditional and that the scan protocol to be used satisfies the conditions for safe scanning for the specific implant. This guide assumes that the MRI protocol will be applied to MOM devices while they are implanted inside the body. It is also expected that standardized MRI safety measures will be followed during the performance of this scan protocol.

1.2This guide covers the clinical evaluation of the tissues surrounding MOM hip replacement devices in patients using MRI. This guide is applicable to both total and resurfacing MOM hip systems.

1.3The protocol contained in this guide applies to whole body magnetic resonance equipment, as defined in section 2.2.103 of IEC 60601-2-33, Ed. 3.0, with a whole body radiofrequency (RF) transmit coil as defined in section 2.2.100. The RF coil should have quadrature excitation.

1.4The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard.

1.5This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. The user may consider all precautions and warnings provided in the MR system and hip implant labeling prior to determining the applicability of these protocols.

Committee
F 04
DocumentType
Guide
Pages
9
PublisherName
American Society for Testing and Materials
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy

ASTM F 3224 : 2017 Standard Test Method for Evaluating Growth of Engineered Cartilage Tissue using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ASTM F 3037 : 2015 Standard Guide for Clinical Trial Design for Hip Replacement Systems (HRSs) (Withdrawn 2020)

ASTM F 2503 : 2008 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
ASTM F 2503 : 2005 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
ASTM F 2503 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
ASTM F 2503 : 2013 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
IEC 60601-2-33:2010+AMD1:2013+AMD2:2015 CSV Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-33: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis
ASTM F 2503 : 2020 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment

View more information
US$75.00
Excluding Tax where applicable

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.