• There are no items in your cart
We noticed you’re not on the correct regional site. Switch to our AMERICAS site for the best experience.
Dismiss alert

AS 2542.2.6-1995

Superseded

Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by
superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

Sensory analysis of foods Specific methods - Ranking

Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF 1 User , PDF 3 Users , PDF 5 Users , PDF 9 Users

Superseded date

04-03-2024

Language(s)

English

Published date

05-04-1995

Preview

1 - AS 2542.2.6-1995 SENSORY ANALYSIS OF FOODS - SPECIFIC METHODS - RANKING
1 - PREFACE
1 - METHOD
1 - 1 SCOPE
1 - 2 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
1 - 3 DEFINITIONS
2 - 4 PRINCIPLE
2 - 5 APPARATUS
2 - 6 GENERAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
2 - 6.1 Testing area
2 - 6.2 Assessors
2 - 7 PROCEDURE
2 - 7.1 Preliminary discussion
2 - 7.2 Preparation of test samples
2 - 7.3 Test Technique
3 - 8 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
3 - 8.1 Summary of results
3 - 8.2 Statistical analysis
5 - 9 TEST REPORT
5 - 10 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
7 - APPENDIX A - SPECIMEN ANSWER FORM
8 - APPENDIX B - EXAMPLES
8 - B1 EXAMPLES OF TESTING FOR ANY DIFFERENCES IN RANK SUMS
11 - B2 EXAMPLES OF TESTING FOR A PRE-DETERMINED RANK ORDER
13 - APPENDIX C - STATISTICAL TABLES

AS 2542.6-1995 sets out a forced-choice method for ranking in the sensory analysis of foods when determining if differences exist between three or more samples.

This Standard sets out a forced-choice method for ranking in the sensory analysis of foods when determining if differences exist between three or more samples.NOTES:1 Ranking is an ordinal method and only yields information about directional differences between samples; it does not give any information about the degree of difference between samples.2 The method is used to determine if differences exist between samples based on the ranking of those samples for a single specified criterion which has been declared by the test supervisor and is understood by the assessors. That criterion may be -(a) the intensity or degree of a specified characteristic, e.g. sweetness, orange colour intensity, toughness, overall quality; or(b) the degree of like or dislike of a specified characteristic.3 For trained assessors, ranking is particularly useful as a means of selecting a sub-set of samples from a larger initial number based on a specific criterion. The sub-set may then be submitted to more detailed tests.4 For untrained assessors and when the number of samples is small, ranking is useful because the method is easily understood, may be used without specific training and may be performed relatively quickly.5 The method is useful in the training and selection of assessors.

Committee
FT-022
DocumentType
Standard
ISBN
0 7262 9595 7
Pages
15
PublisherName
Standards Australia
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy
Supersedes
UnderRevision

First published as AS 2542.2.6-1995.

AS 2542.1.1-1984 Sensory analysis of foods General guide to methodology - General requirements
AS 2542.1.1-2005 Sensory analysis General guide to methodology - Types of test
AS 2542.3-1989 Sensory analysis of foods - Glossary of terms

AS 2542.1.1-2005 Sensory analysis General guide to methodology - Types of test
AS 2542.1.3-1995 Sensory analysis of foods General guide to methodology - Selection of assessors

View more information
£40.57
Excluding VAT

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.